Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S, with an 89 score against 75.8. The Google Pixel 5 is a newer cellphone, and it is also a lot lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a just a little better display density.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S captures much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a camera with a way higher resolution, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with longer battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23 percent bigger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Google Pixel 5 is also cheap compared to the nubia Red Magic 3S.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.