Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Honor 50 Pro is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, with a general score of 77 against 75.8. Honor 50 Pro is a newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat thinner and lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Honor 50 Pro has an older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Honor 50 Pro counts with a little bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a same size screen, the Honor 50 Pro also has a quite better resolution of 1236 x 2676 and a just a bit higher display pixels density. Nubia Red Magic 3S features just a little better performance than Honor 50 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Honor 50 Pro takes clearer pictures and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera and better video frame rates.
Honor 50 Pro's storage capacity to store more games and applications is very similar to nubia Red Magic 3S's one, both have equal internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with improved battery performance than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.