Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 385 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a lot better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, with a global score of 92.1 against 75.8. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a much newer and a little bit thinner cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's also just a little bit heavier. These devices have Android operating system, but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has 14 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a bit more powerful processor than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has 12 GB more RAM. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much more vibrant screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a quite bigger screen, a bit higher pixels quantity in each inch in the display and a higher 1280 x 2800 resolution.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has just a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has faster 60 fps video frame rate, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in low light situations, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a better 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has 768 GB more internal memory capacity. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a bit longer battery life than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a lot more expensive than nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.