Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 385 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has a global score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. HTC One M9's body has the same thickness than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it is lighter.
The HTC One M9 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits processor and an extra GPU. HTC One M9 counts with a much better display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per display inch.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S takes much better photographs and videos than HTC One M9, because it has a lot better 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, a way bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photography, a much better video resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality pictures.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a very superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2840mAh.
The HTC One M9 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.