Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Cyber shade | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a general score of 77 against 75.8. HTC U Ultra's design is extremely lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. HTC U Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel quantity per inch in the display.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a better performing CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater amount of RAM and more CPU cores. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a greater camera than HTC U Ultra, because it has a much more mega pixels camera in the back, a larger aperture, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The HTC U Ultra has more memory capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it is more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 3S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the nubia Red Magic 3S. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy HTC U Ultra, else you can save some money and get the nubia Red Magic 3S, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.