Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android, HTC Sense UI |
| 2019-10-16 | 2018-01-17 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 EYEs is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S, with a 76.9 score against 75.8. The HTC U11 EYEs design is lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S, although it was released only 21 months before. The HTC U11 EYEs works with Android, HTC Sense UI OS, and nubia Red Magic 3S works with Android 9.0 Pie OS.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit better looking display than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a little bit worse pixel amount in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite bigger display. The HTC U11 EYEs has a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a better CPU than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better camera than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a much higher video definition.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with better battery lifetime than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3930mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.