Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-16 | 2018-11-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.21 x 2.85 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Cyber shade | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G76 MP10 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 40.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate 20 RS Porsche Design has a global score of 87.7, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S's general score of 75.8. Huawei Mate 20 RS Porsche Design is a somewhat lighter phone than nubia Red Magic 3S, but both of them are 0.38inches thick. Both devices we are comparing work with the same Android 9.0 Pie operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has just a bit better performance than Huawei Mate 20 RS Porsche Design, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM. Huawei Mate 20 RS Porsche Design counts with a slightly better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
Huawei Mate 20 RS Porsche Design has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S captures way better pictures and videos than Huawei Mate 20 RS Porsche Design, because although it has a smaller sensor taking less light and dull colors, it also counts with a more mega-pixels back facing camera, a lot better video quality and a larger diafragm aperture.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features better battery life than Huawei Mate 20 RS Porsche Design, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.