Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-10-16 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit has a score of 77, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G7 Fit has the previous 8.1 Oreo version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. LG G7 Fit is an older phone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's noticeably lighter and thinner anyway.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a quite superior processing power than LG G7 Fit, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores. The LG G7 Fit counts with a better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
The nubia Red Magic 3S captures greater videos and photos than LG G7 Fit, because it has a lot larger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures, a much higher video definition, a much larger aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited situations and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a slightly bigger memory for applications and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a superior battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 67% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.