Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-16 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S, with an 81 score against 75.8. The LG G7 ThinQ design is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even though it was released around a year before. These devices include the same Android 9.0 Pie OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
LG G7 ThinQ has a better display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a better screen density. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little faster processor than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots much clearer photos and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a way bigger sensor which gives a much better image and video quality, a much higher video resolution and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a superior battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 67% greater battery size.
LG G7 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.