Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, with a overall score of 82.7 against 75.8. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but the LG G8X ThinQ has the previous 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The LG G8X ThinQ body is thinner and lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S, although they were released with only a few months difference.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little faster processor than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM. The LG G8X ThinQ features just a bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340px resolution, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with a little bit better screen pixels density.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a superior camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos, a back facing camera with a much better resolution, a much better video quality and a larger aperture to take better low light photography and video.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with longer battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
LG G8X ThinQ not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.