Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Titan gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a general score of 85.4, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's general score of 75.8. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG K92 has an older 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The LG K92 is a newer phone, and it is also a little lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little better processing power than LG K92, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better looking screen than LG K92, although it has a bit lower number of pixels per display inch and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, they both have a screen of the same size.
Nubia Red Magic 3S captures a little bit better photos and videos than LG K92, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse 48 MP resolution, and they both have a same size sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a larger camera aperture and a much better video definition. The LG K92 has much more storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has better battery duration than LG K92, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
The LG K92 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.