Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Holographic white |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Stylo 6 is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having a score of 76.7 against 75.8. These phones work with Android operating system, but the LG Stylo 6 has the older 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. LG Stylo 6's design is thinner but a bit heavier than nubia Red Magic 3S, and they were released only 7 months apart.
LG Stylo 6 has a screen that is very similar to nubia Red Magic 3S's display, although the LG Stylo 6 also has a little bit better number of pixels in each display inch, a slightly better 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a bit bigger display. LG Stylo 6 features a greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit better processing power than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior camera than LG Stylo 6, because it has a lot more MP back facing camera, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot higher video resolution and a larger camera aperture for better low light captures and videos.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with greater battery performance than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the LG Stylo 6 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.