Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-16 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cyber shade | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting an 82.5 score against 75.8. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but LG V30S ThinQ has older 8.0 Oreo version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. LG V30S ThinQ's body is notably lighter and incredibly thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S, even though it was released only 20 months before.
LG V30S ThinQ has a little bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a higher pixels quantity per inch of display. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit faster CPU than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a back facing camera with way more MP and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a way better battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
LG V30S ThinQ is a lot more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.