Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 overall score. Although LG V35 ThinQ is older than the nubia Red Magic 3S, it's body is notably thinner and lighter. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit more powerful processor than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and more pixels per display inch. LG V35 ThinQ features a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels, a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much higher video definition.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a way better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52% more battery capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.