Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V60 ThinQ has the older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. The LG V60 ThinQ construction is just a little heavier but just a little bit thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S, and they were only released 5 months apart.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a screen that's very similar to nubia Red Magic 3S's screen, although the LG V60 ThinQ also has a quite bigger screen, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a little higher 1080 x 2460px resolution. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better CPU than LG V60 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 3S captures much better videos and photos than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a worse 7680x4320 video definition, a back facing camera with much less mega-pixels and a tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures.
LG V60 ThinQ's battery life is very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3S one.
LG V60 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.