Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S, with a score of 85.3 against 75.8. These phones have Android OS, but the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a newer and incredibly thinner phone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but it is also heavier.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has just a bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a bit more pixels per inch in the display, a lot higher 1892 x 2688 resolution and a larger screen. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a superior storage to install games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little better performance than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit superior battery duration than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4449mAh.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest one, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.