Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has a global score of 89.6, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. Although the Motorola edge and nubia Red Magic 3S were released only 7 months apart, the Motorola edge is just a little thinner and lighter. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but the Motorola edge has the previous 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit faster processor than Motorola edge, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a little more vivid screen than Motorola edge. Both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a screen of the same size and a better pixels quantity per inch of display.
The Motorola edge counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola edge also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little better battery lifetime than Motorola edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Motorola edge features just a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola edge also counts with higher video frame rates, a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a back-facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Motorola edge is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.