Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 has a general score of 86.1, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's overall score of 75.8. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 20 has older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. The Motorola Edge 20 is a newer cellphone, and it's also incredibly lighter and much thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
Nubia Red Magic 3S and Motorola Edge 20 count with very similar displays, and although the Motorola Edge 20 has a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch of display, they both have a display with the same size. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior storage to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 20, because it has 128 GB more internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit faster processor than Motorola Edge 20, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 20 shoots clearer videos and photos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 20 also counts with better 30 fps video frame rate and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has improved battery duration than Motorola Edge 20, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.