Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a global score of 87.1, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 20 Lite has the older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite is a newer cellphone, and it is also lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little sharper display than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it has a just a bit worse pixels density and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, they both have a display with the same size.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite has just a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures in low light environments, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with a back camera with a much higher 108 mega-pixels resolution and faster video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a battery lifetime that's very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3S one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.