Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Mineral Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2022) is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a score of 84.7 against 75.8. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Motorola Edge (2022) has 12 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Motorola Edge (2022) is a way newer cellphone, and it is also notably lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
Motorola Edge (2022) and nubia Red Magic 3S feature very similar screens, because although the Motorola Edge (2022) has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixel quantity in each inch in the screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S and the Motorola Edge (2022) both feature very similar batteries performance. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a camera with lesser MP, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and video and a lot higher video quality.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Motorola Edge (2022) is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.