Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a 78.5 score against 75.8. These phones have Android OS, but Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has older 12 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is a much newer phone, and it is also lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a slightly better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher display density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a superior storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S has just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion takes slightly better pictures and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with better video frame rate, a back-facing camera with a better 50 mega-pixels resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.