Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a score of 80.9, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS, but Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has 12 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra construction is extremely newer, a bit lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a same size display, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a just a bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a battery duration that's very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3S one. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a much better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs, better 30 frames per second video frame rates and a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.