Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having a global score of 81.9 against 75.8. Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a newer device, and it's also noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has the older 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features an incredibly better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher number of pixels per display inch and a quite better 1256 x 2760px resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as the nubia Red Magic 3S one, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with improved battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4310mAh.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a much tinier camera sensor providing a much lower image quality and a camera with less MP, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.