Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has older 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's body is notably newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a brighter display than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little higher pixels density.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has 256 GB more internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S and the Motorola Edge 50 Pro both count with really similar cameras, and although the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light situations, a more mega-pixels back camera, a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality and faster video frame rate, they both have the same video definition.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.