Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, getting an 87.1 score against 75.8. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a newer phone, and it is also somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit higher pixels density. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. Both of them have 12 GB of RAM and 8 cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit superior battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots a little bit better videos and photos than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a better resolution camera, a much larger sensor and better video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.