Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G Plus is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, with a general score of 82.6 against 75.8. Moto G 5G Plus is a a little thinner and just a little lighter cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, although both were only released with a couple of months difference. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better CPU than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a screen that's just as good as the nubia Red Magic 3S one, and although the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels and a bit more pixels per screen inch, they both have a display of the same size. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a little bit better camera than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 48 mega-pixels resolution, a same size back-facing camera sensor and a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features just a bit bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's battery performance is just as good as the battery duration in nubia Red Magic 3S.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.