Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Smoke black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Power has a general score of 76.1, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 global score. The Moto G Power is a a little bit lighter device than nubia Red Magic 3S, but they have the same thickness. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Moto G Power has the previous 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features just a bit better screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit bigger display. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Moto G Power, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM. The Motorola Moto G Power and nubia Red Magic 3S both have quite similar batteries duration. Nubia Red Magic 3S takes better photographs and videos than Moto G Power, and although they both have a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a much bigger camera sensor shooting much higher quality pictures, a back camera with much more MP and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Motorola Moto G Power not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.