Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) has an overall score of 79.3, which is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) body is newer, a little bit lighter and a little thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit superior processing unit than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better display than Moto G Stylus (2021), although it has a little smaller display, a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit less pixels per screen inch. Moto G Stylus (2021) has a slightly better memory to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with superior battery life than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a little bit better camera than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture and a 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a much higher video definition.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) is also a bargain compared to others, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.