Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G has an overall score of 86.2, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but Moto G200 5G has the older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Moto G200 5G is a extremely newer cellphone, and it is also just a bit lighter and a little thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Motorola Moto G200 5G and nubia Red Magic 3S count with very similar displays, although the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a bit larger display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a just a little greater pixel number in each inch in the screen.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G200 5G has a camera that's just as good as nubia Red Magic 3S's camera, because although the Moto G200 5G has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and better 30 fps video frame rates.
Moto G200 5G's battery performance is just as good as nubia Red Magic 3S's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.