Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G7 Plus has a general score of 76.1, which is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 overall score. These phones use Android operating system, but the Moto G7 Plus has older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though the Moto G7 Plus and the nubia Red Magic 3S were only released 8 months apart, the Moto G7 Plus is thinner and lighter.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little bit better display than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a bit lower pixels amount per display inch, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a better processing unit than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a greater storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much longer battery lifetime than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery size.
The nubia Red Magic 3S takes better pictures and videos than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a back camera with a way better resolution, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a much larger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.