Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G8 Power has a global score of 76, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. Moto G8 Power is a a little lighter phone than nubia Red Magic 3S, but they are equally thin. Both devices we are comparing include Android OS (operating system), but Moto G8 Power has an older 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit superior processing unit than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a slightly better screen than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a little larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a greater storage for games and applications than Moto G8 Power, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a way better video definition and a way larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Moto G8 Power and nubia Red Magic 3S both have very similar battery durations.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Motorola Moto G8 Power is also by far the cheapest one, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.