Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-10-16 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z Force has a global score of 75.8, which is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's general score of 75.8. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto Z Force has the older 7.0 Nougat version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. The Motorola Moto Z Force design is a lot thinner and extremely lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S, although it was released many years before.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. Moto Z Force has a little more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Moto Z Force has more storage to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a very superior battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and videos and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Moto Z Force is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.