Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cyber shade | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, with a 77.4 score against 75.8. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is an older device than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but Motorola made it incredibly thinner and notably lighter anyway. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a way higher resolution camera in the back, a lot bigger sensor, a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2730mAh.
Although Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it costs more than the nubia Red Magic 3S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as nubia Red Magic 3S. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get nubia Red Magic 3S, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.