Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-10-16 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Cyber shade | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 has a general score of 77.6, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's general score of 75.8. These devices include the same Android 9.0 Pie OS, so both of them should give you very similar operating system features. The Moto Z3 body is incredibly lighter and extremely thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S, despite of the fact that it was released around 14 months before.
Moto Z3 features a display that's very similar to the display in nubia Red Magic 3S, because although the Moto Z3 has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher display pixels density. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a way better camera than Moto Z3, because it has a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations, a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Motorola Moto Z3 has a bigger memory for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Motorola Moto Z3 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.