Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Cyber shade | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 Play has a score of 76.3, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's overall score of 75.8. Moto Z3 Play's design is incredibly lighter and a lot thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even though it was released about 16 months before. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite bigger screen.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a more powerful CPU than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better camera than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot better video resolution, a camera with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution and a way larger back camera sensor.
Motorola Moto Z3 Play features a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Moto Z3 Play is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.