Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G has a score of 84.6, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. The Motorola One 5G construction is newer, a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S. Motorola One 5G features a screen that is just as good as the nubia Red Magic 3S one, and although the Motorola One 5G has a bit higher 1080 x 2520 resolution and a just a little better screen density, they both have a display of the same size.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S takes slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, a same size camera aperture and the same resolution back camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way higher video definition.
The Motorola One 5G counts with more storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Motorola One 5G's battery life is very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3S one.
The Motorola One 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.