Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPS |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a score of 81.6, which is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. Motorola One 5G Ace's design is newer and just a bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S's, but it is also a bit thicker. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a bit better looking screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, although it has a bit lower count of pixels per display inch and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, they both have a same size display.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a slightly better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little bit better camera than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a same size aperture and a 48 mega pixels back-facing camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot better video quality. Motorola One 5G Ace has a battery life that is just as good as nubia Red Magic 3S's battery duration.
The Motorola One 5G Ace is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.