Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action has an overall score of 78.5, which is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's score of 75.8. Motorola One Action is a a bit thinner and somewhat lighter device than nubia Red Magic 3S, although they were released with only 2 months difference. The nubia Red Magic 3S features just a little better processing power than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola One Action features a slightly better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels and a little better screen pixel density. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a greater camera than Motorola One Action, because it has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low light environments and a much higher video quality.
The Motorola One Action has a bigger storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has a 43 percent larger battery capacity.
Motorola One Action not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.