Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a global score of 79.8, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola One Hyper has an older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although Motorola One Hyper and nubia Red Magic 3S were released only a couple months apart, Motorola One Hyper is just a little lighter and just a little thinner.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a quite larger display. Motorola One Hyper features a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has just a little better processing power than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with improved battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lot lower resolution camera, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Motorola One Hyper is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.