Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a global score of 80.7 against 75.8. The Motorola One Vision body is somewhat thinner and lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even though both of them were released with only a few months difference. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little better performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM.
Motorola One Vision features a little more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher pixel count in each display inch and a bit higher 1080 x 2520 resolution. Motorola One Vision features a slightly better memory for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The nubia Red Magic 3S captures slightly better photos and videos than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a 48 megapixels back facing camera, a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor and a same size camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way higher video resolution. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much longer battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.