Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom has a general score of 80, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's overall score of 75.8. Even though the Motorola One Zoom and the nubia Red Magic 3S were released only 1 months apart, the Motorola One Zoom is lighter and just a bit thinner. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little more vivid display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340px resolution, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a bit larger display.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better CPU than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3S takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same sensor size, a 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot higher video quality. Nubia Red Magic 3S features greater battery duration than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola One Zoom not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.