Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 overall score. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has the older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola razr (2020) is a newer phone, and it is also somewhat thinner and lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a little bit higher display pixel density and a bit larger display. Motorola razr (2020) and nubia Red Magic 3S have quite similar storage capacity to install games and applications, they have equal internal storage capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit faster processor than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S features just a bit better camera than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, a F1.7 aperture and a back camera with a 48 megapixels resolution, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than nubia Red Magic 3S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the nubia Red Magic 3S. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get nubia Red Magic 3S, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.