Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a general score of 80.8, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's score of 75.8. The Nokia XR20 design is newer than nubia Red Magic 3S's, although it's a little thicker and notably heavier. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS, but Nokia XR20 has the previous 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit faster processing unit than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM. Nokia XR20 has a little sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Nokia XR20 also has a quite greater amount of pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a slightly better camera than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger sensor capturing higher quality photos and a bigger aperture for better captures and video in low-light environments.
Nokia XR20 counts with a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Nubia Red Magic 3S has just a little better battery lifetime than Nokia XR20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4630mAh.
The Nokia XR20 is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.