Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has an overall score of 77.7, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but the OPPO Find X2 Neo has the previous 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. OPPO Find X2 Neo's body is way lighter and incredibly thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S, even though both were released with only a few months difference.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater screen density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a little bit better performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo. They have 12 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Nubia Red Magic 3S and OPPO Find X2 Neo count with similar storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, they have exactly the same internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X2 Neo, and although they both have a camera with a 48 MP, a same size aperture and a 0.5 inches camera sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features superior battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.