Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having a overall score of 82.1 against 75.8. Both devices we are comparing work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has an older 12 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G design is newer, just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a little larger display and a higher screen density. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has more internal memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A13 5G counts with a battery performance that's very similar to nubia Red Magic 3S's battery lifetime. Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a less megapixels back camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a much higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.