Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 385 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A20s has a score of 77, which is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. Galaxy A20s is a lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, although both were released only 0 months apart. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A20s has an older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a better performing processor than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A20s, because it has a greater pixels density, a little bit larger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3S has superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A20s, because it has a lot higher video quality, a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a larger camera aperture and a way bigger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.