Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a general score of 76.1 against 75.8. Galaxy A22 is a newer cellphone, and it is also lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A22 has the older 12 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a quite larger display and a greater screen pixel density. The nubia Red Magic 3S has slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy A22. The nubia Red Magic 3S captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.