Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having a 79.9 score against 75.8. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a newer phone, and it's also somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S. These phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has the previous 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM. Galaxy A25 5G has a little sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a little bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Galaxy A25 5G has more memory for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. Nubia Red Magic 3S and Galaxy A25 5G both feature extremely similar batteries duration. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a way better video quality, a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger camera aperture for better low light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.