Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30 has a score of 79.6, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's score of 75.8. Even though Galaxy A30 and the nubia Red Magic 3S were only released with a few months difference, Galaxy A30 is extremely thinner and extremely lighter. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a quite worse pixel amount in each display inch, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a quite superior performance than Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has improved battery duration than Galaxy A30, because it has a 25 percent more battery size. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a very superior camera than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better image and video quality, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.