Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having an 81.7 score against 75.8. The Galaxy A41 construction is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S, although they were released with only 7 months difference. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A41 has older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a slightly better display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater count of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A41, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little better performance than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better battery performance than Galaxy A41, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have a 0.5 inches sensor and a 48 mega-pixels camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos in low light environments and a way higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.